Thursday, January 1, 2026
Summary
President Trump's National Guard deployments get a swift kick out of Democrat-led cities after the Supreme Court says, 'No, thank you!'
Full Story
π§© Simple Version
Imagine President Trump, like a kid with a shiny new set of toy soldiers, decided to deploy them to various cities just because he felt like it. Then, POOF! The Supreme Court, acting like the ultimate grown-up, gently but firmly said,
"Excuse me, sir, but those aren't your personal action figures to send wherever you please without a very good reason!"
So, like a petulant child being told to put away his toys, Trump announced he was taking his National Guard troops back home from Chicago, Los Angeles, and Portland. The governors of those cities, who were already squinting at the troops wondering why they were there, basically threw a party.
π The Giggle Spin
Picture this: President Trump, donning a tiny general's hat that kept slipping over his eyes, was all, "My magnificent National Guard, reporting for duty in blue cities! Because⦠reasons!" Then, out of nowhere, the Supreme Court, wielding a giant red 'NO!' stamp, slammed it down. CRUNCH!
They basically ruled,
"Sir, your 'federal authority for arbitrary military deployment' card has expired. Please collect your highly confused troops."
β Giggle Reality Check
President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday, December 31, 2025, that he is removing National Guard troops from Chicago, Los Angeles, and Portland, Oregon. This decision came after a significant setback at the Supreme Court. The highest court in the land declined an emergency request from the Trump administration concerning troops in Illinois, effectively saying there was no valid legal authority for their deployment to enforce immigration policies (Source: Supreme Court Ruling).
Trump, ever the eloquent one, posted on Truth Social,
"We will come back, perhaps in a much different and stronger form, when crime begins to soar again β Only a question of time!"
π Why This Is Hilarious
This whole situation is a delightful masterclass in political theater meets legal slapstick. Itβs hilarious because it's like watching a magician's grand illusion unravel when the audience points out the hidden strings, forcing the magician to declare, "I meant to do that!"
The image of the Supreme Court essentially telling the President,
"Sir, this isn't how we play 'army',"